Login with password
Forgotten password

Catalogue

Search within the site. The repositories of the NIO portal are used as catalogues. These catalogues contain information on datasets and data structure, their use, data administrator etc. The owner of the information is always the institution which created them, regardless if the institution is part of the private sector or a non-govermental organisation. The owner of all information within the public information system is the state.
IMPORTANT!
Since 9.12.2016, the "DATA" are being published on our NEW OPEN DATA PORTAL "OPSI": https://podatki.gov.si/data/search .
 

FILTERS


FIELD

Information Society (10)
Public administration, administrative procedures and information security (7)
General (3)
Culture (1)

BUILDING BLOCK

Digital identities, electronic signiture and e-Documents (19)
Central IT building blocks (10)
Central building blocks, e-Government architecture (5)
Interoperability framework, central applications (2)
Central software distribution (1)
Common methodologies and policies (1)
All building blocks

INTEROPERABILITY LEVEL

E-Services (9)
Technical interoperability (5)
Organizational interoperability (2)
Semantic interoperability (2)
Legislative interoperability (1)

INTEROPERABILITY SUBLEVEL

E-services (9)
Cross-sectorial agreements (2)
Data presentation and exchange (1)
Contract (1)
Data interfaces (1)
Interconnection Services (1)
XML-based standards (1)
XML schemas (1)
Distributed Application Architecture (1)
Web Services (1)
All interoperability sublevels

STATUS

Recommended (14)
Mandatory (4)
Adopted (1)

FORMAT

PDF (15)
ZIP (3)
DOC (3)
DOCX (3)
BINARY (2)
XML_TEXT (1)
TXT (1)
Vsi formati

INSTITUTION

MINISTRSTVO ZA JAVNO UPRAVO (10)
Ministrstvo za digitalno preobrazbo (5)
Ministrstvo za notranje zadeve (2)
Ministrstvo za kulturo (2)

19 Results in catalogue

Sort by

Electronic identity management is becoming a key element of e-business but lack of common approaches raises many questions regarding the privacy and security. In Slovenia, qualified digital certificates are used for user authentication and electronic signature since 2000 when the legal basis for e-commerce and e-signature was introduced. Despite the fact that qualified certificates are being issued by certification authorities for more than ten years we are facing today the situation that the usage of e-signatures as well as qualified digital certificates themselves is relatively complex and not sufficiently widespread to allow wider implementation of e-commerce in the private as well as the public sector. Furthermore, the usage of secure signature creation devices (SSCD) is even substantially less common. Due to above mentioned facts and taking into account current trends in the EU countries as well as the development of information technology it is essential to provide to the citizens and businesses safe, simple and modern e-signature and e-identity concepts. A detailed analysis of the options available to achieve this goal was performed in order to prepare legal, organisational and technical bases for the introduction of an e-identity which will allow unique e-identification and creation of a qualified electronic signature. A detailed analysis of the options available was performed in order to prepare legal, organisational and technical bases for the introduction of an e-identity which will allow unique e-identification and creation of a qualified electronic signature. When analysing these goals the following basic objectives for the e-identity system renewal have been identified: • ease of use, • broad applicability, • high level of security, • protection of personal data, • ease of integration, • uniform management, • relatively quick deployment, • acceptable cost. Based on these eight objectives, options were divided into three different sections that were analysed and evaluated independently of each other: • Section 1: legal options, • Section 2: identifier models, • Section 3: different technical implementations. Final results of the analysis take into account several views; in particular, the following had been considered: • decision model evaluations results, where individual variants were evaluated by various stakeholders organised in focus groups (service providers in public and private sector, end users (citizens and governmental employees) and interdepartmental working (IWG) group experts), • consumer representatives opinion, • opinion of private service provider representatives, • external legal opinion, • interdepartmental working group opinion, • a proposal for a new e-signature, e-identification, e-authentication and related services EU regulation, • latest projects in other countries, • results of the STORK project implementation.

Available as: PDF
Asset | Release: 0.1 | Last change date: 02.03.2015 | 524 views

Available as: DOC PDF
Asset | Release: 0.1 | Last change date: 14.04.2014 | 236 views