Login with password
Forgotten password

Assets

Here you can explore assets
such as strategies, good practicies, domain models, ontologies, thesauri  and code lists listed on our NIO online repository.

IMPORTANT! Since 9.12.2016, the "DATA" are being published on our NEW OPEN DATA PORTAL "OPSI": https://podatki.gov.si/data/search .

FILTERS


FIELD

Public administration, administrative procedures and information security (57)
Information Society (44)
General (39)
Environment, INSPIRE (12)
Protection of personal data and public information (9)
Culture (7)
Statistics (6)
Economy (4)
Transport (3)
Internal affairs (2)
Environment (2)
Agriculture, fisheries, forestry and food (2)
Education (2)
Finance (2)
Science and Technology (2)
Health care (1)
Justice (section attorneys, prosecutors and criminal sanctions) (1)
Judiciary and civil proceedings (1)
Taxation (1)
International issues (1)
All fields

BUILDING BLOCK

Central IT building blocks (25)
Common methodologies and policies (21)
Interoperability framework, central applications (19)
Digital identities, electronic signiture and e-Documents (19)
Central building blocks, e-Government architecture (14)
Central software distribution (2)
All building blocks

INTEROPERABILITY LEVEL

E-Services (45)
Organizational interoperability (36)
Technical interoperability (34)
Semantic interoperability (14)
Legislative interoperability (11)

INTEROPERABILITY SUBLEVEL

E-services (42)
National interoperability framework (16)
Semantic assets (11)
Policy of National interoperability framework (11)
Cross-sectorial agreements (9)
Data presentation and exchange (8)
Distributed Application Architecture (7)
Web Services (4)
Interconnection Services (4)
Law (Act) (4)
Accessibility - Interface design principles (4)
Other (3)
Contract (2)
Regulation (Decree) (2)
Data integration and middleware (2)
Data interfaces (1)
File type and document formats (1)
XML-based standards (1)
XML schemas (1)
Decision (1)
Network Services (1)
Regulations (1)
Memorandum (1)
Message transport and security (1)
File and message transfer protocols (1)
Data bases (1)
All interoperability sublevels

STATUS

Recommended (65)
Mandatory (42)
Adopted (33)

FORMAT

PDF (63)
DOCX (21)
DOC (13)
ZIP (6)
PPT (4)
XLSX (4)
BINARY (3)
TXT (2)
XLS (1)
PPTX (1)
XML_TEXT (1)
ODT (1)
Vsi formati

INSTITUTION

MINISTRSTVO ZA JAVNO UPRAVO (46)
Ministrstvo za digitalno preobrazbo (29)
Ministrstvo za javno upravo (14)
Ministrstvo za notranje zadeve (11)
Geodetska uprava Republike Slovenije (7)
Informacijski pooblaščenec (6)
Statistični urad Republike Slovenije (5)
REPUBLIKA SLOVENIJA, MINISTRSTVO ZA KMETIJSTVO IN OKOLJE, AGENCIJA REPUBLIKE SLOVENIJE ZA OKOLJE (4)
Ministrstvo za kulturo (4)
Arhiv Republike Slovenije (3)
Univerza v Mariboru - Fakulteta za elektrotehniko, računalništvo in informatiko (2)
Finančna uprava Republike Slovenije (2)
GEODETSKI INŠTITUT SLOVENIJE (1)
MINISTRSTVO ZA INFRASTRUKTURO IN PROSTOR, GEODETSKA UPRAVA REPUBLIKE SLOVENIJE (1)
Ministrstvo za kulturo (1)
USTAVNO SODIŠČE REPUBLIKE SLOVENIJE (1)
Protokol Republike Slovenije (1)
Komisija za preprečevanje korupcije (1)
Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije (1)
Služba Vlade Republike Slovenije za zakonodajo (1)
Narodna in univerzitetna knjižnica Ljubljana (1)
Urad Vlade Republike Slovenije za informacijsko varnost (1)
Urad Vlade Republike Slovenije za komuniciranje (1)
All institutions

140 Results in catalogue

Sort by

The web portal provides: - current information on the programme implementation, publish best practices (both at national and EU levels) and reports on administrative burdens in an individual regulation (act, rule,…) as measured in the programme - insight into the application containing all the information on administrative burdens -access to the national database of the measured administrative burdens which are imposed on citizens and entrepreneurs by legislation. Selection between various extracts regarding individual burdens (regarding costs and time) is also possible. - additional proposals from users for simplification in order to achieve the greatest effect possible regarding the pursuit of the objective of reducing administrative burdens and simplifying procedures by 25 per cent and consequently, of simpler and more transparent legislation. The portal is intended for all entrepreneurs and citizens who, either in the business process or everyday life, have contact with administrative procedures where they encounter obligations they have to fulfil to meet the requirements of legislation. In addition to entrepreneurs and citizens, the portal is also intended for persons preparing regulations and others employed in the state administration encountering administrative procedures. Within the scope of its better legislation policy, the Republic of Slovenia has started to actively implement the principles of preparing regulations better in order to achieve greater competitiveness for small and medium-sized companies, as well as to increase the satisfaction of citizens who cooperate with the state due to various life-related events. In July 2012, the Government of the Republic of Slovenia adopted the renewed Action Programme for eleminating administrative barriers and reduce regulatory burdens for 2012 and 2013. The positive impacts of implementing better regulation policy are reflected in: • improved competitiveness of companies/the economy, • the promotion of openness of the market, • improved standard of living, • increased transparency, which in practice manifests in: • reducing the costs of companies, • encouraging the business sector, • efficient legislative arrangement, • better legislation, i.e. enhanced execution of obligations. The web portal includes: • The website • The national database of measurements of administrative burdens in the regulations of the Republic of Slovenia, and • The system for the administration of comments.

Asset | Release: 0.1 | Last change date: 12.03.2015 | 249 views

Electronic identity management is becoming a key element of e-business but lack of common approaches raises many questions regarding the privacy and security. In Slovenia, qualified digital certificates are used for user authentication and electronic signature since 2000 when the legal basis for e-commerce and e-signature was introduced. Despite the fact that qualified certificates are being issued by certification authorities for more than ten years we are facing today the situation that the usage of e-signatures as well as qualified digital certificates themselves is relatively complex and not sufficiently widespread to allow wider implementation of e-commerce in the private as well as the public sector. Furthermore, the usage of secure signature creation devices (SSCD) is even substantially less common. Due to above mentioned facts and taking into account current trends in the EU countries as well as the development of information technology it is essential to provide to the citizens and businesses safe, simple and modern e-signature and e-identity concepts. A detailed analysis of the options available to achieve this goal was performed in order to prepare legal, organisational and technical bases for the introduction of an e-identity which will allow unique e-identification and creation of a qualified electronic signature. A detailed analysis of the options available was performed in order to prepare legal, organisational and technical bases for the introduction of an e-identity which will allow unique e-identification and creation of a qualified electronic signature. When analysing these goals the following basic objectives for the e-identity system renewal have been identified: • ease of use, • broad applicability, • high level of security, • protection of personal data, • ease of integration, • uniform management, • relatively quick deployment, • acceptable cost. Based on these eight objectives, options were divided into three different sections that were analysed and evaluated independently of each other: • Section 1: legal options, • Section 2: identifier models, • Section 3: different technical implementations. Final results of the analysis take into account several views; in particular, the following had been considered: • decision model evaluations results, where individual variants were evaluated by various stakeholders organised in focus groups (service providers in public and private sector, end users (citizens and governmental employees) and interdepartmental working (IWG) group experts), • consumer representatives opinion, • opinion of private service provider representatives, • external legal opinion, • interdepartmental working group opinion, • a proposal for a new e-signature, e-identification, e-authentication and related services EU regulation, • latest projects in other countries, • results of the STORK project implementation.

Available as: PDF
Asset | Release: 0.1 | Last change date: 02.03.2015 | 543 views